{"id":5062,"date":"2026-07-12T22:08:38","date_gmt":"2026-07-12T20:08:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/knowledge-base\/accident-damaged-car-germany\/"},"modified":"2026-07-12T22:08:38","modified_gmt":"2026-07-12T20:08:38","slug":"accident-damaged-car-germany","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/accident-damaged-car-germany\/","title":{"rendered":"Accident-damaged car from Germany: why &#8220;not accident-free&#8221; in the invoice does not save the dealer"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n\r\n<div id=\"progress\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/div>\r\n\r\n<!-- EN version of auto-powypadkowe-z-niemiec.\r\n     Judgments verified 12.07.2026: LG K\u00f6ln 26.05.2026 - 18 O 329\/25 (full text, not yet final),\r\n     BGH 10.10.2007 - VIII ZR 330\/06 (NJW 2008, 53, full text), OLG K\u00f6ln 09.04.2025 - 11 U 20\/24\r\n     (NJW-RR 2025, 821, full text NRWE, Rn. 32-36).\r\n     Statutes: \u00a7 346, 348, 433, 434, 437, 440, 476 BGB. -->\r\n<header>\r\n  <div class=\"wrap\">\r\n    <a href=\"\/en\/\" class=\"brand\" aria-label=\"BWLAW\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/wp-content\/themes\/bwlaw-child-1\/assets\/img\/logo-bw.png\" alt=\"BWLAW \u2013 law firm in Germany\" width=\"42\" height=\"28\"><\/a>\r\n    <nav aria-label=\"Main navigation\">\r\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/practice-areas\/construction-law\/\">Construction law<\/a>\r\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/practice-areas\/debt-collection\/\">Debt collection<\/a>\r\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/practice-areas\/company-formation\/\">Corporate law<\/a>\r\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/practice-areas\/employment-law\/\">Employment law<\/a>\r\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/\" class=\"active\">Knowledge base<\/a>\r\n      <a href=\"\/en\/#zespol\">Team<\/a>\r\n    <\/nav>\r\n    <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/defective-car-from-germany\/#kontakt\" class=\"btn\">Contact a lawyer <span class=\"arr\">\u2192<\/span><\/a>\r\n    <button class=\"burger\" aria-label=\"Menu\">\u2630<\/button>\r\n  <\/div>\r\n<\/header>\r\n\r\n<section class=\"shero\" style=\"padding-bottom:3.5rem\">\r\n  <div class=\"glow\"><\/div>\r\n  <div class=\"wrap\" style=\"grid-template-columns:1fr\">\r\n    <div>\r\n      <nav class=\"crumbs\" aria-label=\"Breadcrumbs\"><a href=\"\/en\/\">Home<\/a><span>\/<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/\">Knowledge base<\/a><span>\/<\/span><b>Cars<\/b><\/nav>\r\n      <span class=\"eyebrow\">Cars<\/span>\r\n      <h1 style=\"max-width:28ch\">Accident-damaged car from Germany: why &#8220;not accident-free&#8221; in the invoice does not save the dealer<\/h1>\r\n      <p class=\"lead\">A buyer paid a German dealer 24,950 euros for a used car with 122,000 km on the clock. The online listing advertised it as accident-free, while the invoice carried a small note saying the car was sold &#8220;not as free of repainting and not as accident-free&#8221;. After the purchase it turned out the car had rolled over three years earlier and the insurer had written it off as a total loss. The Regional Court of Cologne ordered the dealer to pay the money back \u2014 and explained why such a formula in a consumer contract achieves nothing. If you bought an accident-damaged car from Germany, this judgment maps out your route.<\/p>\r\n      <div class=\"art-meta\">\r\n        <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/wp-content\/themes\/bwlaw-child-1\/assets\/img\/dr-artur-barczewski.webp\" alt=\"Dr. Artur Barczewski\" loading=\"lazy\">\r\n        <div><b>Dr. Artur Barczewski<\/b>Rechtsanwalt \u00b7 attorney-at-law<\/div>\r\n        <div style=\"margin-left:1rem;border-left:1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.25);padding-left:1rem\">\u2248 8 min read<br>updated: July 2026<\/div>\r\n      <\/div>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n  <\/div>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<article class=\"sec\">\r\n  <div class=\"wrap\">\r\n    <div class=\"prose rv\" style=\"font-size:1.02rem\">\r\n      <h3 style=\"font-size:1.35rem;margin-top:2.2rem\">The story: &#8220;accident-free&#8221; in the listing, &#8220;not accident-free&#8221; in the invoice<\/h3>\r\n      <p>In May 2025 a consumer bought a used car, first registered in 2018, from a dealer. The online advertisement promised an accident-free vehicle. When the buyer&#8217;s husband asked directly, he was told the car might have had at most a &#8220;minor accident&#8221;. On the invoice, however, the dealer placed a formula with two exclamation marks: the vehicle is expressly sold not as free of repainting and not as accident-free.<\/p>\r\n      <p>After handover the defects began \u2014 from a leaking tailgate to a smoking engine. The real bombshell came at an authorised brand workshop: the car had been through a serious accident and had not been properly repaired. An insurance assessor&#8217;s report from December 2022 showed the vehicle had rolled over, with estimated repair costs of 43,770 euros net against a replacement value of 28,300 euros. A textbook total loss. The buyer withdrew from the contract and demanded her money back. The dealer refused \u2014 after all, &#8220;it was in writing&#8221;.<\/p>\r\n      <p>The Regional Court of Cologne (LG K\u00f6ln) sided with the buyer: the dealer must repay 23,445.87 euros with interest plus the pre-litigation legal fees, and should have taken the car back long ago (judgment of 26 May 2026, 18 O 329\/25, not yet final).<\/p>\r\n\r\n      <h3 style=\"font-size:1.35rem;margin-top:2.2rem\">A serious accident history is a defect \u2014 even after repair<\/h3>\r\n      <p>The starting point has been settled for years. The buyer of a used car must accept normal wear and tear matching the age and mileage \u2014 but not that the vehicle has been through an accident causing more than trivial damage. Germany&#8217;s Federal Court of Justice draws the triviality line very narrowly: only minor external paint damage qualifies. Even small bodywork damage falls outside it. And crucially, <strong>a professional repair changes nothing<\/strong>. The mere fact that the car went through a serious accident makes it defective, because the status of an accident vehicle cannot be &#8220;repaired away&#8221; (BGH, judgment of 10 October 2007, VIII ZR 330\/06).<\/p>\r\n      <p>In the Cologne case the dealer pointed to the age and mileage of the car. Without success. Even with a seven-year-old vehicle showing 122,000 km, a buyer paying more than 20,000 euros may expect that any past repair costs did not exceed the value of the car itself. Since the vehicle had a total loss in its history, it was defective \u2014 and whether it was later repaired professionally no longer mattered. The court did not even need to examine the list of a dozen day-to-day faults, the kind of dispute where <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/car-from-germany-broke-down-after-purchase\/\">the burden of proof usually takes centre stage<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n      <h3 style=\"font-size:1.35rem;margin-top:2.2rem\">When can a dealer contractually &#8220;lower the standard&#8221;? The \u00a7 476 BGB test<\/h3>\r\n      <p>German law does allow a seller to agree with a consumer that the goods fall short of the objective requirements \u2014 for instance that a car has an accident history. Since the reform of sales law, however, such a &#8220;negative quality agreement&#8221; must clear strict formal hurdles (\u00a7 476 (1) sentence 2 BGB). Two elements are required:<\/p>\r\n      <ul>\r\n        <li><strong>specific information before the contract is concluded<\/strong> \u2014 the seller must describe each individual deviation from the standard. Generic phrases such as &#8220;accident vehicle&#8221;, &#8220;possible damage&#8221; or precisely &#8220;not accident-free&#8221; are not enough. What would suffice is a description like: rear-left collision damage, professionally repaired,<\/li>\r\n        <li><strong>express and separate consent of the consumer<\/strong> \u2014 the deviation must stand out in the contract rather than blend into the rest of the text, and it needs separate acceptance, in practice a separate signature.<\/li>\r\n      <\/ul>\r\n      <p>The Higher Regional Court of Cologne recently sharpened these requirements: clauses describing mere uncertainty \u2014 &#8220;possibly not accident-free&#8221; \u2014 say nothing about any concrete characteristic of the vehicle and therefore create no valid agreement (OLG K\u00f6ln, judgment of 9 April 2025, 11 U 20\/24).<\/p>\r\n      <p>The invoice note failed on both fronts. It described no concrete damage \u2014 certainly not a rollover ending in a total loss. And it was neither highlighted nor separately signed, just &#8220;hidden&#8221; among the other terms. The verbal assurance of at most a &#8220;minor accident&#8221; made things worse for the dealer, because instead of revealing the true extent of the damage it played it down.<\/p>\r\n\r\n      <h3 style=\"font-size:1.35rem;margin-top:2.2rem\">No repair deadline needed \u2014 withdrawal straight away<\/h3>\r\n      <p>Normally a buyer must set the seller a deadline to cure the defect before withdrawing. With an accident vehicle this requirement falls away. Delivering a replacement is off the table, because a second identical used car \u2014 same condition, same history \u2014 simply does not exist, especially where the buyer picked the specific vehicle after a personal inspection. And no repair can remove what constitutes the defect: the car&#8217;s status as an accident vehicle. The buyer could therefore withdraw without giving the dealer a &#8220;second chance&#8221;. The repair offer the dealer made long after the withdrawal came too late to matter.<\/p>\r\n\r\n      <h3 style=\"font-size:1.35rem;margin-top:2.2rem\">The settlement: purchase price minus kilometres driven<\/h3>\r\n      <p>After an effective withdrawal the parties return what they received, step by step against each other. The seller repays the price, the buyer returns the car plus compensation for its use. The latter follows a simple formula: purchase price times kilometres driven divided by the expected remaining mileage. In the Cologne case the buyer had driven 7,681 km, and with an assumed total mileage of 250,000 km this produced a deduction of 1,504.13 euros \u2014 leaving 23,445.87 euros to repay.<\/p>\r\n      <p>The practical lesson: <strong>every kilometre driven after the defect surfaces shrinks the refund<\/strong>. The buyer parked the car in September 2025, and that was the right call.<\/p>\r\n      <p>One more twist concerned the buyer&#8217;s old car, which the dealer had bought for 3,000 euros under a separate contract. The court treated the two contracts as independent \u2014 neither referred to the other, and the later set-off of the prices was a matter of convenience. The buyer therefore recovered the full price of the new car, not a price reduced by the trade-in. The dealer also had to cover the pre-litigation lawyer&#8217;s letter and was held to be in default of acceptance, which shifts further risks onto him.<\/p>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n\r\n    <div class=\"hl rv\" style=\"max-width:760px\">\r\n      <span class=\"eyebrow\">Checklist<\/span>\r\n      <h3>You suspect your car from Germany has a serious accident history<\/h3>\r\n      <p>Secure the listing before it disappears \u2014 a screenshot with the address bar and date visible. Collect the invoice or contract, all correspondence with the seller and notes of conversations. Have an authorised workshop or an independent expert assess the traces of repair, measure the paint thickness and pull the vehicle history \u2014 an insurance assessor&#8217;s report from a previous owner can decide the whole case. Withdraw from the contract in writing, with a deadline for repayment. And keep driving to a minimum \u2014 every kilometre reduces the refund, and do not resell the car, because it must go back to the seller.<\/p>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n\r\n    <div class=\"prose rv\" style=\"font-size:1.02rem\">\r\n      <h3 style=\"font-size:1.35rem;margin-top:2.2rem\">What this means for you<\/h3>\r\n      <ul>\r\n        <li><strong>&#8220;It was in writing&#8221; is often a bluff.<\/strong> A &#8220;not accident-free&#8221; formula in the contract or invoice does not meet the \u00a7 476 BGB test and does not strip you of consumer claims.<\/li>\r\n        <li><strong>A repair does not erase the accident.<\/strong> A car that suffered more than trivial damage remains defective even after a perfect repair \u2014 the accident history is irremovable.<\/li>\r\n        <li><strong>You need not ask for a repair first.<\/strong> With the defect &#8220;accident vehicle&#8221; you may withdraw from the contract without setting a cure deadline.<\/li>\r\n        <li><strong>Time works against you twice.<\/strong> The refund melts with every kilometre driven, and the claims become time-barred two years after handover.<\/li>\r\n        <li><strong>Documents win these cases.<\/strong> In Cologne a three-year-old insurance assessment decided the matter \u2014 the paper trail of the vehicle&#8217;s history beats witness statements.<\/li>\r\n      <\/ul>\r\n\r\n      <h3 style=\"font-size:1.35rem;margin-top:2.2rem\">Frequently asked questions<\/h3>\r\n      <p><strong>Does a &#8220;not accident-free&#8221; note in the contract exclude my claims?<\/strong><br>In a consumer purchase from a dealer \u2014 no. A valid deviation from the standard requires a concrete description of the damage before the contract is concluded plus express, separate consent, in practice a separate signature under a highlighted clause. A generic formula blended into the invoice text meets neither condition.<\/p>\r\n      <p><strong>The car was professionally repaired after the accident \u2014 can I still withdraw?<\/strong><br>Yes, provided the damage went beyond minor paintwork. Under BGH case law the defect is the fact of the serious accident itself, and the quality of the later repair is irrelevant. A botched repair can be a further, separate defect on top.<\/p>\r\n      <p><strong>Do I have to give the seller a chance to repair first?<\/strong><br>Not where the defect is the car&#8217;s accident history. No repair can remove it, and delivering an identical replacement is unworkable with used goods. Withdrawal is available immediately.<\/p>\r\n      <p><strong>How much money will I actually get back?<\/strong><br>The purchase price minus compensation for your use of the car. It is calculated by multiplying the price by the kilometres you drove and dividing by the expected remaining mileage. In the judgment: at a price of 24,950 euros and 7,681 km driven, the deduction came to roughly 1,500 euros.<\/p>\r\n      <p><strong>I bought the car for my business \u2014 do the same rules apply?<\/strong><br>No. The strict \u00a7 476 BGB test protects consumers. In business purchases sellers rely on warranty exclusion clauses instead \u2014 which also frequently fail, <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/warranty-exclusion-used-car-germany\/\">as we explain in a separate article<\/a>. One limit binds everyone: fraudulent concealment of a defect, for example <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/rolled-back-odometer-car-from-germany\/\">a rolled-back odometer<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n\r\n      <p style=\"font-size:.85rem;color:var(--ink-soft)\">Judgments discussed: LG K\u00f6ln, judgment of 26 May 2026 (18 O 329\/25, not yet final at the time of publication), BGH, judgment of 10 October 2007 (VIII ZR 330\/06) and OLG K\u00f6ln, judgment of 9 April 2025 (11 U 20\/24). Legal position: July 2026.<\/p>\r\n      <p style=\"font-size:.78rem;color:var(--ink-soft);margin-top:1.2rem;max-width:70ch\">This article is for information only and does not replace legal advice. The law may change \u2014 consult a lawyer about your individual case.<\/p>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n\r\n    <div class=\"mini-cta rv\"><b>Is the dealer hiding behind a note in the contract?<\/b><span style=\"color:var(--ink-soft);font-size:.92rem\">Send us the invoice, the listing and the car&#8217;s documents \u2014 we will assess whether the clause binds you at all and how much you can realistically recover.<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/defective-car-from-germany\/#kontakt\" class=\"btn\">Send documents for review <span class=\"arr\">\u2192<\/span><\/a><\/div>\r\n    <div class=\"prose rv\" style=\"margin-top:1.5rem\">\r\n      <h3 style=\"font-size:1.1rem\">Related topics<\/h3>\r\n      <div class=\"chips\" style=\"margin-top:.8rem\">\r\n        <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/defective-car-from-germany\/\">Defective car bought in Germany \u2192<\/a>\r\n        <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/car-from-germany-broke-down-after-purchase\/\">Car broke down after purchase \u2014 who proves the defect \u2192<\/a>\r\n        <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/rolled-back-odometer-car-from-germany\/\">Rolled-back odometer on a car from Germany \u2192<\/a>\r\n        <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/warranty-exclusion-used-car-germany\/\">Warranty exclusion in a business purchase \u2192<\/a>\r\n      <\/div>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n  <\/div>\r\n<\/article>\r\n\r\n<section class=\"sec alt\">\r\n  <div class=\"wrap\">\r\n    <div class=\"lawyer rv\">\r\n      <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/wp-content\/themes\/bwlaw-child-1\/assets\/img\/dr-artur-barczewski.webp\" alt=\"Dr. Artur Barczewski \u2013 author of the article\" loading=\"lazy\">\r\n      <div>\r\n        <b>Dr. Artur Barczewski<\/b>\r\n        <div class=\"role\">Rechtsanwalt \u00b7 attorney-at-law<\/div>\r\n        <p>Author of this article. Represents clients before courts across Germany. <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/team\/artur-barczewski\/\">Meet the author \u2192<\/a><\/p>\r\n      <\/div>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n  <\/div>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<section class=\"cta-end\">\r\n  <div class=\"glow\"><\/div>\r\n  <div class=\"wrap\">\r\n    <span class=\"eyebrow rv\">Contact<\/span>\r\n    <h2 class=\"rv d1\">Does your situation look similar?<\/h2>\r\n    <p class=\"rv d2\">Every case has details that change the outcome. Describe yours \u2014 you will get a concrete answer and a cost overview.<\/p>\r\n    <div class=\"row rv d3\">\r\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/defective-car-from-germany\/#kontakt\" class=\"btn\">Describe your case <span class=\"arr\">\u2192<\/span><\/a>\r\n      <a href=\"tel:+4933555310969\" class=\"phone\">\u260e +49 335 553 10969<\/a>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n  <\/div>\r\n<\/section>\r\n\r\n<footer>\r\n  <div class=\"wrap\">\r\n    <div class=\"foot-grid\">\r\n      <div>\r\n        <div class=\"foot-brand\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/wp-content\/themes\/bwlaw-child-1\/assets\/img\/logo-bw.png\" alt=\"Logo BWLAW\" width=\"38\" height=\"26\"><\/div>\r\n        <p>Kanzlei Dr. Barczewski &amp; Dr. Wr\u00f3blewska GbR<br>Rudolf-Breitscheid-Stra\u00dfe 10<br>15230 Frankfurt (Oder), Germany<br><a href=\"tel:+4933555310969\">+49 335 553 10969<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"mailto:info@bwlaw.de\">info@bwlaw.de<\/a><\/p>\r\n      <\/div>\r\n      <div>\r\n        <div class=\"foot-h\">Practice areas<\/div>\r\n        <ul>\r\n          <li><a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/practice-areas\/construction-law\/\">Construction law \/ VOB\/B<\/a><\/li>\r\n          <li><a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/practice-areas\/employment-law\/\">Employment law<\/a><\/li>\r\n          <li><a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/practice-areas\/debt-collection\/\">Debt collection<\/a><\/li>\r\n          <li><a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/practice-areas\/company-formation\/\">Corporate law<\/a><\/li>\r\n        <\/ul>\r\n      <\/div>\r\n      <div>\r\n        <div class=\"foot-h\">Legal<\/div>\r\n        <ul>\r\n          <li><a href=\"\/en\/\">Home<\/a><\/li>\r\n          <li><a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/\">Knowledge base<\/a><\/li>\r\n          <li><a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/impressum\/\">Legal notice (Impressum)<\/a><\/li>\r\n          <li><a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/privacy-policy\/\">Privacy policy<\/a><\/li>\r\n        <\/ul>\r\n      <\/div>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n    <div class=\"foot-bottom\">\r\n      <span>\u00a9 2026 BWLAW \u00b7 Kanzlei Dr. Barczewski &amp; Dr. Wr\u00f3blewska GbR<\/span>\r\n      <span>Rechtsanw\u00e4lte \u00b7 attorneys-at-law \u00b7 Frankfurt (Oder)<\/span>\r\n    <\/div>\r\n  <\/div>\r\n<\/footer>\r\n\r\n<div class=\"sticky-cta\">\r\n  <a href=\"tel:+4933555310969\" class=\"call\">\u260e Call us<\/a>\r\n  <a href=\"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/defective-car-from-germany\/#kontakt\" class=\"book\">Describe your case<\/a>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\r\n{\r\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\r\n  \"@graph\": [\r\n    {\r\n      \"@type\": \"Article\",\r\n      \"headline\": \"Accident-damaged car from Germany: why \\\"not accident-free\\\" in the invoice does not save the dealer\",\r\n      \"description\": \"A hidden total loss and a 'not accident-free' note: LG K\u00f6ln 18 O 329\/25 explains why the formula fails \u00a7 476 BGB and the consumer recovers the price.\",\r\n      \"inLanguage\": \"en\",\r\n      \"author\": { \"@type\": \"Person\", \"name\": \"Dr. Artur Barczewski\", \"url\": \"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/team\/artur-barczewski\/\" },\r\n      \"publisher\": { \"@type\": \"LegalService\", \"name\": \"BWLAW \u2013 Kanzlei Dr. Barczewski & Dr. Wr\u00f3blewska GbR\", \"url\": \"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/\" },\r\n      \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-12\",\r\n      \"dateModified\": \"2026-07-12\",\r\n      \"mainEntityOfPage\": \"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/knowledge-base\/accident-damaged-car-germany\/\"\r\n    },\r\n    {\r\n      \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\r\n      \"mainEntity\": [\r\n        {\r\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\r\n          \"name\": \"Does a \\\"not accident-free\\\" note in the contract exclude my claims?\",\r\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": { \"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"In a consumer purchase from a dealer \u2014 no. A valid deviation from the standard requires a concrete description of the damage before the contract is concluded plus express, separate consent, in practice a separate signature under a highlighted clause. A generic formula blended into the invoice text meets neither condition.\" }\r\n        },\r\n        {\r\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\r\n          \"name\": \"The car was professionally repaired after the accident \u2014 can I still withdraw?\",\r\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": { \"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Yes, provided the damage went beyond minor paintwork. Under BGH case law the defect is the fact of the serious accident itself, and the quality of the later repair is irrelevant. A botched repair can be a further, separate defect on top.\" }\r\n        },\r\n        {\r\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\r\n          \"name\": \"Do I have to give the seller a chance to repair first?\",\r\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": { \"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Not where the defect is the car's accident history. No repair can remove it, and delivering an identical replacement is unworkable with used goods. Withdrawal is available immediately.\" }\r\n        },\r\n        {\r\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\r\n          \"name\": \"How much money will I actually get back?\",\r\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": { \"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"The purchase price minus compensation for your use of the car. It is calculated by multiplying the price by the kilometres you drove and dividing by the expected remaining mileage. In the judgment: at a price of 24,950 euros and 7,681 km driven, the deduction came to roughly 1,500 euros.\" }\r\n        },\r\n        {\r\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\r\n          \"name\": \"I bought the car for my business \u2014 do the same rules apply?\",\r\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": { \"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"No. The strict \u00a7 476 BGB test protects consumers. In business purchases sellers rely on warranty exclusion clauses instead, which also frequently fail. One limit binds everyone: fraudulent concealment of a defect, for example a rolled-back odometer.\" }\r\n        }\r\n      ]\r\n    }\r\n  ]\r\n}\r\n<\/script>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Construction law Debt collection Corporate law Employment law Knowledge base Team Contact a lawyer \u2192 \u2630 Home\/Knowledge base\/Cars Cars Accident-damaged car from Germany: why &#8220;not accident-free&#8221; in the invoice does not save the dealer A buyer paid a German dealer 24,950 euros for a used car with 122,000 km on the clock. The online listing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":4417,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"template-bwlaw-page.php","meta":{"footnotes":"","rank_math_title":"Accident-damaged car from Germany: your rights | BWLAW","rank_math_description":"Accident-damaged car from Germany? The note \"not accident-free\" does not bar consumer claims \u2014 LG K\u00f6ln 18 O 329\/25. How to withdraw and recover the price.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"accident-damaged car from germany","rank_math_robots":[]},"class_list":["post-5062","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"bwlaw_import":{"lang":"en","template":"template-bwlaw-page.php"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5062"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5062\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4417"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bwlaw.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}